Over the last few years, accelerators and the programs they operate have become key players
within startup ecosystems, helping thousands of founders build and grow innovative businesses
in today's "new economy." Accelerators have become far more than simple business-service
providers or investment vehicles, instead emerging as invaluable operators within public and
private spheres. They bring together entrepreneurs, investors, public entities, and
corporations with the common goal of helping innovative businesses quickly take root.
Policymakers and other actors in the startup community should understand the essential role of
accelerators within the startup ecosystem, as proper incentivization of accelerators has the potential to
effectively facilitate the cultivation and cross-pollination of startups.
The European Accelerator Report 2016 provides an exclusive inside look
at accelerator programs in the region.
This report is a follow-up on the
2015 Accelerator Report
and aims to explain how the accelerator industry is evolving in the region,
how accelerators support their activities, and how they impact local and regional
tech startup ecosystems.
Please note that many organizations supporting entrepreneurship, such as incubators and
venture builders, have not been included in the scope of this report, even if they share
some common traits with accelerators.
The acceleration industry is evolving rapidly, and it is becoming increasingly
difficult to precisely define what an accelerator is. As new models emerge,
the term "accelerator" describes an increasingly diverse set of programs and organizations, and,
often, the lines that distinguish accelerators from similar institutions, like incubators and
early-stage funds, become blurred. For the purposes of this report, accelerators can be
defined according to Miller and Bound (2011), and share these common traits:
1) An application process that is open to all, yet highly competitive.
2) Possible provision of pre-seed investment (grant or equity).
3) A focus on small teams instead of individual founders.
4) Time-limited support comprising programmed events and intensive mentoring.
5) Cohorts or ‘classes’ of startups rather than individual companies.
€15,566,629 invested in 992 startups from 44 accelerators
Most cash invested:
500 Startups
Most startups accelerated:
MassChallenge
€2,000,001 invested in 612 startups from 23 accelerators
Most cash invested:
Numa Paris
Most startups accelerated:
Impulse Labs
€7,458,380 invested in 428 startups from 26 accelerators
Most cash invested:
IMPACT Accelerator
Most startups accelerated:
Conector Startup Accelerator
€6,431,085 invested in 218 startups from 17 accelerators
Most cash invested:
Techstars
Most startups accelerated:
TechFounders
€220,000 invested in 180 startups from 5 accelerators
Most cash invested:
Building Global Innovators - BGI
Most startups accelerated:
Beta-i
€1,855,000 invested in 169 startups from 8 accelerators
Most cash invested:
Rockstart
Most startups accelerated:
HighTechXL Accelerator
€2,780,000 invested in 158 startups from 10 accelerators
Most cash invested:
TIM #WCAP Accelerator
Most startups accelerated:
IHM
€1,675,000 invested in 138 startups from 6 accelerators
Most cash invested:
Kickstart Accelerator
Most startups accelerated:
MassChallenge Switzerland
€892,000 invested in 124 startups from 4 accelerators
Most cash invested:
Impact Hub Vienna
Most startups accelerated:
Impact Hub Vienna
€0 invested in 100 startups from 1 accelerator
Most cash invested:
-
Most startups accelerated:
GrowthUP
€60,000 invested in 97 startups from 6 accelerators
Most cash invested:
KIUAS Accelerator
Most startups accelerated:
Startup Sauna
€1,539,797 invested in 85 startups from 2 accelerators
Most cash invested:
Accelerace
Most startups accelerated:
Accelerace
€696,901 invested in 61 startups from 6 accelerators
Most cash invested:
500 Startups
Most startups accelerated:
STING (Stockholm Innovation & Growth)
€100,000 invested in 60 startups from 3 accelerators
Most cash invested:
FintechFactory
Most startups accelerated:
StartupLab
€225,000 invested in 60 startups from 7 accelerators
Most cash invested:
Roularta Mediatech Accelerator
Most startups accelerated:
LeanSquare
€80,000 invested in 49 startups from 5 accelerators
Most cash invested:
GammaRebels
Most startups accelerated:
MIT Enterprise Forum Poland
€1,130,000 invested in 36 startups from 1 accelerator
Most cash invested:
NDRC
Most startups accelerated:
NDRC
€450,000 invested in 31 startups from 2 accelerators
Most cash invested:
ABC Accelerator
Most startups accelerated:
ABC Accelerator
€450,000 invested in 23 startups from 2 accelerators
Most cash invested:
StartupYard
Most startups accelerated:
StartupYard
€440,000 invested in 20 startups from 2 accelerators
Most cash invested:
Startup Wise Guys
Most startups accelerated:
Startup Wise Guys
€70,000 invested in 15 startups from 3 accelerators
Most cash invested:
Segments Accelerator
Most startups accelerated:
Eleven Ventures
€0 invested in 12 startups from 1 accelerator
Most cash invested:
-
Most startups accelerated:
Paul Wurth InCub
€368,000 invested in 10 startups from 2 accelerators
Most cash invested:
Aquincum Incubator
Most startups accelerated:
Aquincum Incubator
€89,600 invested in 8 startups from 1 accelerator
Most cash invested:
Numa Moscow
Most startups accelerated:
Numa Moscow
€200,000 invested in 7 startups from 2 accelerators
Most cash invested:
Blue Lime Labs
Most startups accelerated:
Blue Lime Labs
€100,000 invested in 7 startups from 1 accelerator
Most cash invested:
Risky Business
Most startups accelerated:
Risky Business
€25,000 invested in 1 startups from 1 accelerator
Most cash invested:
The Accelerator - by Metavallon
Most startups accelerated:
The Accelerator - by Metavallon
United Kingdom
€15,566,629
Spain
€7,458,380
Germany
€6,431,085
Italy
€2,780,000
France
€2,000,001
Netherlands
€1,855,000
Switzerland
€1,675,000
Denmark
€1,539,797
Ireland
€1,130,000
Austria
€892,000
United Kingdom
992
France
612
Spain
428
Germany
218
Portugal
180
Netherlands
169
Italy
158
Switzerland
138
Austria
124
Ukraine
100
⬆ 37% more than 2015
By capital invested
€5,807,941
Europe | Private fund
€4,030,000
Spain | Mix fund
€3,819,765
Europe | Private fund
€2,410,000
Europe | Private fund
€1,610,943
United Kingdom | Private fund
€1,539,797
Denmark | Mix fund
€1,200,000
Europe | Mix fund
€1,167,350
United Kingdom | Private fund
€1,167,350
United Kingdom | Private fund
€1,130,000
Ireland | Public fund
Top seed accelerators ranked by cash amount invested into startups (excludes provided services, mentorship, coworking space, or follow-up investment).
This ranking is not a measure of the success or quality of these programs.
Are you a for-profit organization?
66.3% of accelerators in the region claim to be for-profit ventures, similar to what was reported in the 2015 edition (64.6%). Typically, for-profit accelerators are funded with private capital from investors aiming to generate long-term profit. This is primarily accomplished by the appreciation of their equity in startups, but also by providing business-support services and by offering “acceleration-as-a-service” to large corporations.
Not-for-profit accelerators support industries that provide a specific public benefit, such as Healthtech and Edtech. Others aim to boost entrepreneurship in their communities. They may also focus on providing new opportunities for minority groups or look to boost economic activity in a given region. These programs and the organizations operating them may be either privately or publicly funded. Generally, these programs do not take equity and instead offer free support.
Examples of not-for-profit accelerators include Startup Sauna, SeedRocket, MassChallenge, and Fast Track Malmö.
How are you funded?
What was your main source of revenue in 2016?
Corporate sponsorship
32%
Corporate partnerships (operating acceleration program w/corporation)
23%
No revenue
16%
Charge for mentorship
8%
Other
8%
Exit of startups
6%
Charge for office space
5%
Events
3%
How will you generate revenue in the medium & long terms?
Corporate partnerships (operating acceleration program w/corporation)
45%
Corporate sponsorship
44%
Exit of startups
32%
Other
18%
Charge for mentorship
18%
Charge for office space
13%
Events
11%
In the 2015 Report, 60.2% accelerators indicated that they intended to
follow the traditional "cash-for-equity" model, first established in 2005 by Y
Combinator, which involves investing a small amount of seed money in a startup
— around $25,000 on average — in exchange for equity (usually between 5% and 10%).
Increasingly, this model is becoming rare as accelerators reconsider their general outlook.
Most likely, the small number of exits — 52 reported in 2016 — has proven insufficient
in funding their operations.
Only 6% of accelerators operating in the region reported
exits as a main source of revenue in 2016.
53.2% of accelerators take equity in startups and
32% predict making revenue from exits in the future.
Accelerators have historically relied on, and continue to explore, alternative models of revenue generation.
90% plan to increase their revenue in the medium- to long-term by
incorporating such models, including, but not limited to, charging
for mentorship, subletting office space, hosting events, and working with corporations.
As we predicted last year, the relationships between accelerators and
corporations have grown stronger and more numerous.
53.7% of accelerators are at least partially funded by a corporation, and
66.8% aim to generate future revenue from services sold to corporations.
Corporate revenue generated by accelerators came from two main sources in 2016:
23% was a result of corporate partnerships, generally in the form of a white-labeled
or jointly-run acceleration program created by the accelerator on behalf of the corporation, and
32% came from corporate sponsorship packages sold by accelerators.
Do you invest cash?
Accelerators that do not invest cash generally focus on providing services and resources such as workshops, mentorships, coworking spaces and connections.
Do you take equity from participating companies?
What range?
Equity free
47%
Between 1% and 3%
7%
Between 4% and 6%
16%
Between 7% and 10%
21%
Over 10%
4%
Undisclosed
5%
In 2016, the acceleration model has continued to grow and evolve. Four major trends can be identified.
Corporate funding
“Corporations are increasingly engaging in a more meaningful way with startup founders and the broader entrepreneurial ecosystem,” said Bobby Franklin, President and CEO of NVCA. The number of venture capital firms (VCs) has grown by 15.5% each year between 2011 and 2015, according to data from CB Insights. This growth in corporate engagement in the startup ecosystem is beginning to spill over into the accelerator industry.
Corporate revenue in 2017
As the accelerator industry matures, we are seeing increased collaboration between accelerators and corporations. “On the one hand, this is because corporations are discovering that accelerators are an efficient and effective way to engage with startups. On the other hand, accelerators understand that corporations can help them fund operations in the short-to-medium term (exits are often far out). They improve the prospects of their portfolio companies that can potentially sell to, raise funds from, or be acquired by these corporations," said Miklos Grof, co-author of this report.
There is a growing trend for corporations to outsource their acceleration programs due to their limited skills in accelerating startups. Some voices in the startup ecosystem, notably high-profile venture capitalist Fred Wilson, welcome this development. He believes, “Corporations should BUY companies. Investing in companies makes no sense,” as cited by CB Insights.
Corporations can benefit from accelerators in 5 different ways:
Examples of accelerators that are aligning themselves with corporations include: 33ENTREPRENEURS, Collider, Conector Startup Accelerator, and L Marks.
Are your program(s) focused on specific verticals?
Accelerator verticalization is driven in part by the following:
Continuing the trend identified in the 2015 report, the acceleration landscape in the region is increasingly moving towards verticalization, with 62.6% of accelerators running programs focused on a particular industry or sector niche. This trend is likely to continue as regional startup ecosystems continue to mature. This is a very positive development because verticalized accelerators generally bring more value to startups through more qualified acceleration teams, larger pools of quality mentors within the industry, and close corporate ties to related markets.
Some examples of verticalized accelerators in the region include: Startupbootcamp Fintech, Merck Accelerator, Emerge Education, and Next Media Accelerator.
Do you plan to expand to new locations in 2017?
After reaching a certain level of maturity, expansion becomes a natural next step for well-established accelerators. This growth comes in three forms: by opening new vertical programs, by launching new programs in different cities, or by launching programs internationally. Some examples include the recent international launch of programs run by European accelerators, such as Startupbootcamp and NUMA in Mexico or Rockstart in Colombia.
According to Sebastien Brunet, co-author of this report, “There are different reasons for which an accelerator decides to go abroad: to help their startup portfolios expand to new markets by providing softlanding services, to source innovative startups from new regions, to increase the quality of their deal flow and to reinforce their brands on an international level.”
International expansion usually happens in two ways:
Traditionally, the norm for an accelerator was to accelerate 10-30 startups per year by investing $20,000-$50,000 in each business.
Today, accelerators often operate across the investment life cycle in an attempt to fill the gaps in local startup ecosystems and cater to potential financial partners and sponsors. These include governments, universities, and corporations. New operating models have evolved immensly, thereby blurring the lines between accelerators, incubators, and early-stage funds. Of the 193 accelerator programs included in this report, 30% described themselves as a combined accelerator, incubator, venture capital fund, and/or angel group.
By number of startups accelerated in 2016
Country
Accelerator
Startups accelerated in 2016
This ranking is not a measure of the success or quality of these programs.
% of accelerators that reported an interest in investing in these markets in the next 12 months
Internet of things
Big data analytics
Saas
Fintech
Health
45.8%
Cloud services
37.4%
Wearables
35.3%
Mobile apps
34.7%
Others
34.2%
Cleantech
33.2%
E-commerce
33.2%
Agritech
28.9%
Drones
28.9%
Biotech
23.7%
Adtech
23.2%
Education
22.1%
Social media analytics
20.0%
Real estate
14.2%
How do you see the accelerator model changing /evolving in Europe in the next couple of years?
Rockstart Accelerator (Netherlands)
The dramatic increase in accelerators have made our founders' needs different from when we first started 5 years ago. We find ourselves evolving when their needs evolve. For instance, over the years, we've made sure that we've developed specialization in having the right investor and industry mentor contacts for our startups to have a leg up in accessing the right customers, research, and key industry decision-makers. Accelerator specialization is going to be increasingly important in Europe, and is going to be a key factor continuing to support European entrepreneurs moving forward.
IMPACT Accelerator (Spain)
The accelerator sector is growing and being professionalized. The community has grown from very few accelerators offering only informal services to more than 400 accelerators covering a wide range of niches and verticals. We expect to see more niche accelerators, regarding the services provided and the verticals covered. We also expect to see more big corporations relying on professional accelerators to help with innovation, technology and investment challenges.
IncuBus Ventures & Momentum London (United Kingdom)
The accelerator space is rapidly shifting. More and more programmes are entering the market and choosing niche focuses. However I see the biggest change being a shift away from the funding / equity model to a more sustainable model for the long term success of an accelerator programme. We hope to be leading the way with that with the Momentum London programme.
STING (Sweden)
In Stockholm, we see a clear increase in the verticalization of startup support and hubs. This provides entrepreneurs with much more sector-specific know-how and networks than the more general accelerators have done in the past. I believe this development will continue, especially as more corporations are starting their own accelerators in an effort to get access to innovative products and services within their industries
Institutions contacted
80% more than 2015
Replies
60% more than 2015
Accelerators
37% more than 2015
Countries
3 more than 2015
United Kingdom
Spain
France
Germany
Italy
Netherlands
Belgium
Switzerland
Finland
Sweden
Portugal
Poland
Austria
Norway
Bulgaria
Denmark
Slovenia
Czech Republic
Estonia
Hungary
Lithuania
Ireland
Romania
Russia
Greece
Ukraine
Luxembourg